Tag Archives: weight loss



I did it.

Thursday morning I weighed in at 198.4 pounds. The first time, since perhaps my teens, that I’ve had a leading 1 on the scale. And it has stayed there, for 3 days. So it’s not just dehydration or a fluke. I’m actually under 200lbs.

Whether my height is 6’3″ or 6’4″ (I’m somewhere between) this also, coincidentally, marks the point where I drop under 25.0 BMI. Putting me in the normal range.

When I started this journey, in early 2010, I was 285lbs. My body fat was an estimated 30%, now down to about 17%. My BMI was a whopping 35.6, well into the obese range.

I haven’t talked very much about weight loss here, partially because I don’t know what to say about it. I have no secrets; my method was to run until I liked running, to train for race after race to keep my motivation up, to consciously say no to food, and to weigh myself daily to keep both those positive inputs at the right level. I hit plateaus, most recently at around 205 where I’ve been for a couple of months. I never hung my success on losing weight, especially when I hit a plateau. I kept doing what I was doing, and called more running, or faster paces, success.

I dreaded getting on the scale after a vacation or a weekend trip, knowing the spike that would come. Some mornings, I woke up feeling heavy, only to get on the scale to be rewarded with a drop I hadn’t expected. Sometimes that morning weigh in would be the only way to convince myself I didn’t need another snack before dinner, or a second glass of IPA. For some reason my mind viciously resists counting calories, but deals well with the daily feedback of a weight. Most days, it doesn’t weigh on my mind. (I will admit that each day since that first 19x.x photo, I did dread the next day.)

This isn’t a declaration of victory. I am not done with fitness, I know I never really can be, unless I want to go back to where I was. Instead, this is a celebration of what I have accomplished. I couldn’t have done this without all of you. The motivation and support from my friends (old and new) and family was as much a part of this process as the miles on the road.

Where am I going from here? Nowhere, really. 199 wasn’t a ‘target’. Nothing is going to change. I’m going to keep eating right, keep weighing in daily, and keep training for my next half marathon.

I wanted to get this milestone published. To celebrate how far I’ve come. Please forgive the scatterbrained writing and the childish collage.


When training takes a back seat

Sure, this could be a post to say that I haven’t kept up with my goals, that I haven’t stuck to my plan and earnestly recommitting myself to my half marathon plan with just a month to go before I toe the start line at the Pittsburgh Half Marathon nice again.

But that’s not necessary, because despite not writing about it, I have been running. I haven’t missed a single workout through the entire training plan. I just haven’t been writing about it. And rather than getting all tearful and “dear diary” about it, I’m just going to admit I’ve been plenty motivated without the blog. So when I say in my title that training has taken a back seat, I really just mean that it’s not up front, arguing with me about directions and whining for bathroom breaks. It’s in the back seat, getting to the destination. Along for the ride.

I’ve had some great runs these past few weeks, mostly in the form of my increasingly-brutal, wouldn’t-miss-it-for-the-world, speedwork each Thursday. Last one was 4 mile repeats at a pace I didn’t think I could hang for a 1/4 mile, never mind 4 mile long intervals. My tempo run, this coming Thursday is set to be among my longest, fastest runs yet; 5 miles at 8:56, very near my targeted race pace for the Pittsburgh Half.

My weight loss broke another plateau this week and I’m down in the 205-210 range; approaching the normal BMI range for the what seems likely to be the first time since college. I am struggling with some issues surrounding that weight loss and my feelings about it; something I want to write about more soon.

Ultimately all this unabashed good news in the areas of health and fitness is, like I said, riding along with a lot of career/work concerns that are really steering the ship. My boss announced he was leaving his current position at the beginning of March, and the time since then has been a tumult of speculation, application, interviewing and rumor as my colleagues and I all grasped at something that’s been rather sparse of late; a big opportunity to advance. Without running, I think I’d be handling myself with less grace and composure right now. I’ve gotten some great thinking done on the 5 mile runs that dominated my plan this week, and I look forward to the control of my situation that running gives me every time I step out the door.

My goal for tonight is not to let this one languish in the draft folder, so forgive the rough edges. 4 miles tomorrow. 26 days to the Pittsburgh Half.

Is Romulus Athletic Center on the forefront of public health policy

My gym, the Romulus Athletic Center is doing a promotion. When you join up for the year, one of your family members weighs in. When you sign up next year, they weigh in again, and the number of pounds they lost is the percent discount you get on that years registration fee.

lbs. lost = % off next year

If we ignore crazy edge conditions (such as people oscillating wildly in weight every other year to save the most money over time), and assume that weight lost is always good, then this is pretty much perfect. This gym is a public facility, run by the City of Romulus for the benefit of the community. So giving out discounted memberships isn’t going to drive it out of business, but it may provide more motivation to keep people active, help them embrace an active lifestyle. And that is good for the people of Romulus.

First of all, it’s pretty much utterly unscammable. Even if someone starts pulling wrestling-style weigh-up and weigh-down tricks to try to get a bigger discount, they’re not going to be able to pull off much more than what, 10lbs? (Unless they’re eating concrete). At about $500 a year for a membership, that’s $50. Without knowing much about the business of gyms, or the habits of weight scammers, I’m still confident that a 10% discount on a handful of dedicated people won’t break the bank. Much of your gym members are people who aren’t looking to lose much weight, aren’t going to lose much weight, and aren’t willing to intentionally dehydrate themselves for a week to save $50 every other year.

For the people this is intended for, that do lose weight, at $5 per pound lost, this sounds like utter public policy genius to me. Worst case, you end up giving out free gym memberships to a bunch of people dropping 100+lbs a year. What public health official wouldn’t agree to that? For the price of a couple angioplasties, this plan could seriously impact the waistline of a whole community.

It doesn’t really create motivation from nothing; people have to want to lose weight to begin with, at least enough to be willing to try. It’s a closed circle, no one is going to join a gym, and exercise a bunch to get a cheap membership if they don’t have the will to exercise. But the brilliant thing is it’s self regulating; it’s a great expression of an control engineering principle; the Negative Feedback Loop!

The further you are from your ideal weight, the more weight you want to lose, the more weight you can lose, and the cheaper your gym membership will be while you are losing that weight.  Then as you approach your ideal weight (even if you overshoot it!) you get a small, oscillating discount as your weight fluctuates around that value.  Say 0-5% every year if you just stay the same weight and let normal daily fluctuations determine what you weigh in at. If you get fed up with paying full price for the gym, and you go on a year long pizza and beer bender, well you can get a cheap gym member ship again… but not until you lose some of the weight. You have to be making progress to get rewarded, and it does not punish setbacks!

“Sure,” you saavy control systems engineers ask (I know you don’t, but bear with me) “but how come we don’t just give people who weigh more a bigger discount!” Because that rewards being fat, not getting thinner.

“Fine then, bigger discounts for lighter people!” No again! This punishes being fat, which, let’s face it, clothing shopping does well enough.

“Okay, how about instead we set up a goal weight based on some SCIENCE, with a big discount for people who are far from their goal weights. Just like a control system like an HVAC or cruise control!” This has the SAME problem as just big discounts for big people; it rewards being heavy with lower prices. Plus it’s COMPLICATED and nobody likes to do math.  lbs = % is simple!

So intentionally or not, I think the RAC has stumbled on the perfect formula.

Most runners know how helpful it is to have a goal; it certainly has been for me. Whether it’s a new distance, a new speed, a BQ, a PR in a race, or a nice consistent weekly mileage, it’s great to have something tangible that you can reach for, achieve, and feel motivated by. This RAC weightloss promotion, especially if they keep it up year over year, is just one more way to set a goal, and one more way to reward that goal with something small but that generates good feelings and a an incentive to keep going. Weightloss is a reason to join a gym, and a way to use the gym cheaper. It looks like a win/win for the customer, and because the ‘vendor’ in this case also has fitness as a goal, it’s a win/win for the vendor as well. What an elegant solution!

Now obviously, a discount on a gym membership isn’t the only factor in weight loss. Plenty of Americans have free or nearly free access to work gyms, public gyms, low cost memberships to the YMCA. But I think that fitness centers (particularly not-for-profit ones) around the country could benefit from this system, or some variation.